![]() The team's results imply that many nations could secure the necessary resources they need to thrive at a much lower demand than current levels suggest. Essentially, they need to rely more on carbon capture technologies and global trade.ĭespite the study's potentially bleak outlook, the researchers believe their work offers a glimmer of hope in combating the environmental risks of human development. Other countries, such as those in the Middle East, North Africa and sub-Saharan Africa, cannot meet safe and just requirements for carbon because they lack vegetation to help carbon sequestration-capturing the carbon the country emits. On the other hand, poor countries such as Gabon have adequate natural capital to support more activities that improve human well-being, Bakshi said. Because it has more than enough resources for its population, consumption levels would meet the safe and just limits of the framework. Take Canada, a large, rich country with a relatively low population that has a large supply of natural capital like forests and lakes that can capture carbon. These differences often come down to how a nation deals with supply and demand. "There are rich countries that are doing well and there are also some poor countries that are doing well, but the reasons for their successes are very different," Bakshi said. While the socioeconomic status of countries is often related to how well they can provide for their citizens in a sustainable manner, it doesn't always work that way, the researchers said. ![]() Findings showed that 37% of countries do not have the ability to provide for their citizens in a safe and just way in terms of carbon sequestration, and 10% lack the ability to do that with regard to water. Sometimes countries do not have much of a choice. The team found that the majority of countries emit far more than their national ecosystem can handle in terms of carbon, but tend to operate close to their water supply limits. student Yazeed Aleissa analyzed how the needs of 178 nations around the world stacked up against their regions' ecosystems. Using recent water and carbon sequestration data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and other international agencies, Bakshi and his co-author and former Ph.D. "If you're below the social foundation, then you're not meeting basic human needs, and that can be frustrating from an equity point of view." "If you are exceeding the ecological ceiling, then you're not sustainable from an environmental perspective," he said. ![]() Ideally, human activities should exist between the limits of a society's ecological ceiling and its social foundation, a boundary that describes the resources necessary to avoid critical human deprivation of food, water or energy, said Bakshi. This study's framework was created using a system called the framework of planetary boundaries and the concept of a "safe and just operating space," which identifies a country's ecological ceiling, or the scope human activities must work within to reduce the risk of causing irreparable damage to the Earth. "In this study, we sought to ensure we could quantify these challenges in a way engineers could use to make better decisions." "Most engineering disciplines traditionally ignore the role that nature plays in supporting our activities and more broadly, our well-being," said Bakshi, who has been working to advance the concept of sustainable engineering-the practice of designing products or systems with nature-positive decisions in mind-for decades. At the same time, in order to be socially just, countries need to secure resources to meet the basic needs of all of its citizens." "It's imperative that experts look for ways to develop society in an ecologically sustainable manner. Yet because human activities tend to cause unintended side effects like global warming or ozone depletion," said Bhavik Bakshi, co-author of the study and a professor of chemical and biomolecular engineering at Ohio State. "For a country to be self-sufficient, its population needs access to food, water and energy, resources that can often only be provided by the surrounding ecosystem. The study was published recently in the journal One Earth. While it provides for its citizens in regard to carbon use, it is not doing so in an ecologically sustainable manner. The study showed the United States was among the majority of countries that was able to safely and justly provide water to its citizens. The study found that while 67% of nations operate safely and sustainably in regard to water use, only 9% do so in regard to carbon sequestration, or reducing their greenhouse gas emissions. They found that only 6% of 178 countries provide for all their citizens in an ecologically sustainable way in both carbon sequestration and water consumption.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |